“Perhaps institutional structures contributed to the dominance of particular interpretations of Lincoln.”
What institutional structures?
Potentially:
universities;
history departments;
academic journals;
publishers;
funding organizations;
professional historical associations;
conference networks;
curriculum committees;
hiring and promotion systems;
citation networks.
How could they contribute?
Imagine:
Step 1
Universities teach Interpretation A frequently.
Step 2
Students become familiar with A.
Step 3
Some students become historians.
Step 4
They conduct further research within debates surrounding A.
Step 5
Journals publish many articles engaging with A.
Step 6
Those articles receive citations.
Step 7
A becomes increasingly visible and established.
This can create cumulative reinforcement.
But notice:
None of those steps proves that A is false.
It establishes a possible mechanism through which an interpretation becomes dominant.
Comments
Post a Comment