“American historical scholarship celebrates Lincoln because American academic institutions favor narratives compatible with liberal nationalism.”
This is a specific sociology-of-knowledge hypothesis.
It could mean that institutions systematically reward interpretations presenting Lincoln as a national liberator and therefore give less attention to interpretations emphasizing other consequences or interests.
But to establish that proposition, you would need evidence about the institutions themselves.
For example:
university curricula,
textbooks,
hiring patterns,
funding,
publication patterns,
scholarly debates,
treatment of competing interpretations.
Comments
Post a Comment