If something is plausible, why isn't it accepted?

"Plausible" means:

consistent with known facts and reasonably possible.

But many plausible explanations may exist simultaneously.

Example:

Why did a king raise taxes?

Plausible explanations:

  • financing war,
  • paying debts,
  • strengthening authority,
  • funding public works.

All may be plausible.

Historians usually want evidence to determine which explanation is most convincing.

That is why plausibility alone is often insufficient.

Comments