Dr Sohail Ansari

A communiqué is issued   The King does not pardon a person condemned for having committed a defiant  noncompliance of the royal commands. The queen interceded with the king on behalf of the person sentenced , as she always with informed consent, to fill the moral vacuum. Ergo, A King though never condones by any means what constitutes a beach of an oath of fealty, submitted himself to the pleas of queen. ‘A man, who has no sense of history ’Hitler declared, ‘is like a man who has no ears or eyes’. Similarly If one buys a communiqué without analyzing, he has no mind. We should not buy a communiqué before having the answers of a few questions; for example: ·          Who is the condemned person? ·          Why is he condemned? ·          To what extent the stated reason: Queen’s interposition is justified? ·          Did a King pardon because of the queen? Or there was any other reason? Or was it one of the reasons? To answer the above q