Muslims' ancestors were Hindus

This is about ancestry rather than property.

My point is:

If ancestry determines identity,

why stop at one generation?

Why not continue tracing ancestry indefinitely?

This illustrates that genealogical continuity does not automatically determine present legal, religious, or political identity.

People change religion, nationality, language, and citizenship over time.

Modern legal systems generally recognize people's present legal status rather than assigning rights solely based on distant ancestry.