Deductive reasoning
Students of media department can use deductive
reasoning to better understand the world around them.
Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the
concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true. Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as top-down logic. Its counterpart,
inductive reasoning, is
sometimes referred to as bottom-up logic.
Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion drawn from a set
of premises contains no more information than the premises taken collectively.
All dogs are animals; this is a dog; therefore, this is an animal: The truth of
the conclusion is dependent only on the method.
Premise
LOGIC
A previous statement
or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.
"If the premise
is true, then the conclusion must be true"
an assertion
or proposition which forms the basis for a work or theory.
synonyms:
|
proposition, assumption, hypothesis, thesis, presupposition, postulation, postulate, supposition, presumption, surmise, conjecture, speculation, datum, argument, assertion, belief, thought;
premiss
"a
philosophy based on the premise that human life consists of a series of
choices"
verb
|
base an
argument, theory, or undertaking on.
·
state or presuppose (something) as a premise.
synonyms:
|
postulate, hypothesize, conjecture, posit, theorize, suppose, presuppose, surmise, assume, predicate, argue, state, assert;
rare hypothecate
"one
school of thought premised that the cosmos is indestructible"
|
Concordance
an alphabetical list
of the words (especially the important ones) present in a text or texts,
usually with citations of the passages concerned or with the context displayed
on a computer screen.
"a concordance to
the Bible"
1.
2.
formal
agreement or
consistency.
"the concordance
between the teams' research results"
Deductive reasoning
Deductive
reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or
deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the
possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to the University of California.
The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories. The scientific method uses deduction
to test hypotheses and theories.
"In deductive inference, we hold a theory and based on it
we make a prediction of its consequences. That is, we predict what the
observations should be if the theory were correct. We go from the general
— the theory — to the specific — the observations," said Dr. Sylvia
Wassertheil-Smoller, a researcher and professor emerita at Albert Einstein
College of Medicine.
In deductive
reasoning, if something is true of a class of things in general, it
is also true for all members of that class. For example, "All men are
mortal. Harold is a man. Therefore, Harold is mortal." For deductive
reasoning to be sound, the hypothesis must be correct. It is assumed that the
premises, "All men are mortal" and "Harold is a man" are
true. Therefore, the conclusion is logical and true.
According to the University of California, deductive inference
conclusions are certain provided the premises are true. It's possible to come
to a logical conclusion even if the generalization is not true. If the
generalization is wrong, the conclusion may be logical, but it may also be
untrue. For example, the argument, "All bald men are grandfathers. Harold
is bald. Therefore, Harold is a grandfather," is valid logically but it is
untrue because the original statement is false.
A common form of
deductive reasoning is the syllogism, in which two statements — a major premise
and a minor premise — reach a logical conclusion. For example, the premise
"Every A is B" could be followed by another premise, "This C is
A." Those statements would lead to the conclusion "This C is B."
Syllogisms are considered a good way to test deductive reasoning to make sure
the argument is valid.
In an inductive argument, the premises are intended only to be
so strong that, if they were true, then it would be unlikely that the
conclusion is false. There is no standard term for a successful inductive argument. But its success or strength is a matter of degree,
unlike with deductive arguments.
Therefore, inductive reasoning moves from specific instances into a generalized
conclusion, while deductive reasoning moves from generalized principles
that are known to be true to a true and specific conclusion. The accuracy of inductive reasoning is
questionable.
During the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to
reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also
used. Often, deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are confused. It is
important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic
can be identified.
Deductive Reasoning Examples
Deductive reasoning is
a type of reasoning which goes from general to specific. Deductive reasoning is
based on premises and if the premises are true, then the reasoning will be
valid.
Deductive
Reasoning: Everyday Examples
·
In mathematics, If A = B and B = C, then A = C.
·
Since all humans are mortal, and I am a human, then I am
mortal.
·
All dolphins are mammals, all mammals have kidneys; therefore
all dolphins have kidneys.
·
Since all squares are rectangles, and all rectangles have four
sides, so all squares have four sides.
·
If Dennis misses work and at work there is a party, then Dennis
will miss the party.
·
All numbers ending in 0 or 5 are divisible by 5. The number 35
ends with a 5, so it is divisible by 5.
·
To earn a master’s degree, a student must have 32 credits. Tim
has 40 credits, so Tim will earn a master’s degree.
·
All birds have feathers and robins are birds, so robins have
feathers.
·
It is dangerous to drive on icy streets. The streets are icy now
so it is dangerous to drive now.
·
All cats have a keen sense of smell. Fluffy is a cat, so Fluffy
has a keen sense of smell.
·
Snakes are reptiles and reptiles are cold-blooded; therefore,
snakes are cold-blooded.
·
Cacti are plants and all plants perform photosynthesis;
therefore, cacti perform photosynthesis.
·
Red meat has iron in it and beef is red meat, so beef has iron
in it.
·
Acute angles are less than 90 degrees and this angle is 40
degrees so this angle is acute.
·
All noble gases are stable and helium is a noble gas, so helium
is stable.
·
Magnolias are dicots and dicots have two embryonic leaves;
therefore magnolias have two embryonic leaves.
·
Elephants have cells in their bodies and all cells have DNA, so
elephants have DNA.
·
All cars have at least two doors and a Ford Focus is a car, so
the Ford Focus has at least two doors.
·
All horses have manes and the Arabian is a horse; therefore
Arabians have manes.
Other Patterns of Deductive Reasoning
Some deductive reasoning does not follow the
classic reasoning pattern of A = B and B = C, then A = C. Some examples of
other patterns are:
·
Be careful around bees, they might sting you. (The reasoning is
understood that all bees might sting.)
·
It takes me an hour to get to the mall. If I leave at five
o’clock I will reach the mall by six o’clock.
·
That dog is growling so be careful or you might get bitten. (It
is logical is the dog is angry, he might bite.)
·
The apple hit me on the head because of gravity.
·
There are three people in my family. Each one is tall, so
everyone in my family is tall.
Comments
Post a Comment