Character must walk through a drama
By Prof
Dr Sohail Ansari “Ibn 'Uyayna said
that Mutarrif b. 'Abdallah would repeat the following prayer, "O Allah! I
seek Your forgiveness for that which I sought your repentance but to which I
subsequently returned; I seek Your forgiveness from that which I rendered to
You from my self, but then, I was not able to maintain faithfully; and, I seek
Your forgiveness from that by which I claimed I desired your Face but my heart
became corrupted with that which I did."
Actor must left behind
·
Actor
is not an actor if actor walks through a drama while character is left behind
and an actor if character walks through a drama while actor is left
behind.
Narcissism is the pursuit of gratification from vanity or egotistic admiration of one's own attributes.
The term originated from Greek mythology,
where the young Narcissus fell
in love with his own image reflected in a pool of water. Narcissism is a
concept in psychoanalytic theory, which was popularly
introduced in Sigmund Freud's
essay On Narcissism (1914). The American Psychiatric Association has had the classification narcissistic personality disorder in its Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) since 1968, drawing on the
historical concept of megalomania.
Narcissism is also considered a social or cultural problem. It
is a factor in trait theory used in various self-report inventories of personality[1] such as the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory.
It is one of the three dark triadic personality traits (the others being psychopathy and Machiavellianism).
Except in the sense of primary narcissism or healthy self-love, narcissism is usually
considered a problem in a person's or group's relationships with self and
others. Narcissism is not the same as egocentrism.
- Collective narcissism (or group narcissism) is a type of narcissism where
an individual has an inflated self-love of
his or her own ingroup, where an "ingroup" is a group in
which an individual is personally involved.[1] While
the classic definition of narcissism focuses on the individual, collective
narcissism asserts that one can have a similar excessively high opinion of
a group, and that a group can function as a narcissistic entity.[1] Collective
narcissism is related to ethnocentrism; however, ethnocentrism primarily focuses on
self-centeredness at an ethnic or cultural level, while collective
narcissism is extended to any type of ingroup, beyond just cultures and
ethnicities.[1][2] Some
theorists believe group-level narcissism to be an extension of individual
narcissism, though others believe the two to be independent of each other.
- Ethnocentrism is
judging another culture solely by the values and standards of one's own
culture.[1][page needed] Ethnocentric
individuals judge other groups relative to their own ethnic group or
culture, especially with concern for language, behavior, customs, and religion. These ethnic distinctions and subdivisions
serve to define each ethnicity's unique cultural identity.[2] Ethnocentrism
may be overt or subtle, and while it is considered a natural proclivity of
human psychology, it has developed a generally negative connotation.[3
- Identity politics, also called identitarian politics,[1] refers
to political positions
based on the interests and perspectives of social groups with which people
identify. Identity politics includes the ways in which people's politics
may be shaped by aspects of their identity through loosely correlated
social organizations. Examples include social organizations based on age, social
class, culture, dialect, disability, education, ethnicity, language, nationality, gender
identity, generation, occupation, profession, race, religion, sexual orientation, settlement, urban and rural habitation,
and veteran
status. Not all members of any given group are
involved in identity politics.
A reference group is a group to which an individual or another
group is compared.
Sociologists call any group that individuals use as a standard for
evaluating themselves and their own behavior a reference group.
Reference groups are used in order to evaluate and determine the
nature of a given individual or other group's characteristics and sociological
attributes. It is the group to which the individual relates or aspires to
relate himself or herself psychologically. It becomes the individual's frame of
reference and source for ordering his or her experiences, perceptions,
cognition, and ideas of self. It is important for determining a person's
self-identity, attitudes, and social ties. It becomes the basis of reference in
making comparisons or contrasts and in evaluating one's appearance and
performance.
Reference groups provide the benchmarks and contrast needed for
comparison and evaluation of group and personal characteristics. Robert K. Merton hypothesized that individuals compare
themselves with reference groups of people who occupy the social role to which
the individual aspires.[1]
Reference groups are groups that
people refer to when evaluating their [own] qualities, circumstances,
attitudes, values and behaviors.
·
Reference groups act as a frame of reference to which people always
refer to evaluate their achievements, their role performance, aspirations and
ambitions. A reference group can be either from a membership group or non-membership
group. An example of a reference group being used would be the determination of
affluence. An individual in the U.S. with an annual income of $80,000, may consider himself affluent if
he compares himself to those in the middle of the income strata, who earn
roughly $32,000 a year.[3] If, however, the same person considers
the relevant reference group to be those in the top 0.1% of households in the
US, those making $1.6 million or more, then the individual's income of $80,000 would make him or her seem
rather poor.[4][5]
Comments
Post a Comment