Khaled Qaddoumi's rejection of permanent disarmament highlights a fundamental deadlock where Hamas views armed capabilities as essential for self-defense, while Israel and international mediators view those same weapons as an intolerable security threat and an obstacle to peace. 

The Core Arguments from Hamas's Perspective

Self-Defense and Deterrence: Hamas leadership argues that a population living under military control requires physical means to defend itself.
Fear of Vulnerability: The premise that disarmed populations face increased danger drives Hamas's refusal. They believe that laying down arms without a sovereign political resolution would leave civilians defenseless against military force. 
Rejection of External Demands: Officials like Qaddoumi state that resistance weapons are a matter of national principle and are non-negotiable under foreign pressure

Conclusion

The debate centers on a profound lack of trust. Hamas fears that disarmament invites destruction without protection