POLITICAL PARTIES
By Prof Dr. Sohail Ansari
Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari
(originality of concepts and originality of words).
He believes that there can never be a
zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake
of criticism.
Operational style: ‘A glance at the program and
working of political parties in Pakistan
reveals that the parties have mostly a regional, rather than national outlook.
Even the manifestos of some of the parties make no mention of the problems of
areas outside their ‘sphere of influence’. A regular practice of the
politicians in Paksitan is to exaggerate the problems of their own regions to
obtain local support. No political parties work in a scientific manner. None of
the parties maintain a research cell or have a system
to study the
national problems thoroughly and scientifically. They neither have a system to
ascertain the reactions of the people regarding certain political developments,
nor do they believe in conducting opinion polls. Almost all parties have
neither regular politically trained workers nor offices everywhere. Weekly
meetings or other methods of keeping in touch with the masses are unheard of.
The art of
demagogy plays an important part of in winning the political game; most leaders
rely on public speeches, based on emotions, malice and superficial study.
Programs that
have been presented by the parties are too idealistic to be implemented. Most
of the manifestos reflect poor homework and lack of pragmatism. Several
political parties have identical programs, but they do not merge with each
other due to deep-rooted rivalry of their leaderships. Most of the Western
countries where the parliamentary form of government has worked successfully
have a two-party system. But, in Pakistan due to a larger number of
political parties, none is able to attain a clear-cut majority. Thus political
alliances pave the way for coalition government which carries the seeds of
political instability.
As regards membership, none of the existing political
parties can claim to be a mass organization. Membership is mostly fictitious.
Membership forms are handed over to influential party leaders who distribute
them amongst their followers and get their signatures. Landlords and
industrialists get these forms filled by their tenants and laborers who know
little about the party to which they are enrolled. The landlords and
industrialists have their pocket constituencies and easily they get elected.
Parties are joined with the objective of deriving material benefits rather than
to serve the national cause. There is no concept of political loyalty as
loyalties change with the change of political weather’. Safdar mahmood,
`Pakistan political Roots and Development`132-133
(
Image is built
in the light of opinions polls, but as political parties neither have a system
to ascertain the reactions of the people, nor do they believe in conducting
opinion polls; ads do not provoke the required response, and political parties
instead of seeking the reasons for ineffectiveness dismiss ads as ineffective.
Polices unguided
by opinion polls fail to reflect general consensus and pit national leaders
against nation. In democracy, democratic leaders have right to speak to people
and they speak through media; but when they speak without knowing what to
speak; right of speaking passed on to undemocratic forces. Undemocratic forces
grow stronger as an alternative to unconcerned, indifferent, and ignorant
democratic leaders. When leaders are out of tune with general aspiration, media
loses much of its significance as leaders misses the line around which support
could be built.
Presence of
pocket constituency accounts for the absence of even a single ad from many
candidates. Electoral process theoretically provides equal opportunity to all
citizens to seek a public office, but in reality, people having established
following repeatedly contested elections; landlords/tribal leaders tend to be
the primary contestants and they need not to have any media campaign to
approach voters; nor is any effort needed to court electorates; furthermore,
the function of media is fulfilled by ideologically motivated and
dedicated party workers; who
disseminated messages and put up party posters every where.
The feudal and
tribal social origins of the parliamentarians and their dominance in the
federal cabinets renders governments indifferent to public-relationing as the
psychological make up of members deem beneath it. Two party systems of USA and of Great
Britain evolved with time; but in Pakistan , parties came and
disappeared as political rules of game continued to change; and this fluidity
of situation never allowed parties to evolve and make long term strategies for
contesting election. Election campaigns begin two years ago in USA ,
but in country where elections themselves are in doubt political parties find
no reason to start election campaign long before election.
Comments
Post a Comment