God Can Not But Psychohistorian Can, Words Work Overtime, Quotable Quotes, Necessary And Sufficient Condition, Speaking For Not Saying Anything & Fallacy

God Can Not But Psychohistorian Can, Words Work Overtime, Quotable Quotes, Necessary And Sufficient Condition, Speaking For Not Saying Anything & Fallacy By Dr. Sohail Ansari

Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words).

He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism.

Quotable Quotes

·        Intellectual dishonesty is denying intellectual debt one owes despite he owes intellectual cachet to it.

·        Everyone owes his understanding (of a topic) to his own intellectual needs.

·        One ends up unhappy with his achievements because of the failure to learn the difference between motion and direction.

God even can not but Psychohistorian can change past

History is decoupled from poetry as historian ‘packs unwieldy masses of things in the empty cases under the heads of intrigue or war; and poet deals with material lie deeper and spread wider’; but as Hazliit says ‘fear is poetry, hope is poetry, love is poetry, hatred is poetry’; therefore poetry can enable historians to understand ‘the stimulus for action’ and therefore, his accounts of the ‘accident of history’ can help history advance from mere recording of events to the analysis of their antecedents. History had so far ‘fixed boundaries and focal points; clear notions of scholarly  inquires those constitute admissible proofs’; however it is being touted that because of the rise of psychohistory, the history has switched from primarily ‘narrative to psychoanalysis, and history is no longer dealing only with ‘what’ and ‘how’ but ‘why’.

    The pragmatic use of psychology in history is the use of psychological explanation in historical context. Psychoanalysis of the individuals who made history, inferring from consequences of event on their lives could very well helps us understand "The history of the world is but the biography of great men or the autography of a mad man", and help readers to negotiate ‘many cunning passages, contrived corridors and issues of history; but the commitment of psychohistorian to derive facts from a ‘view of human nature that transcends history precludes a commitment to history. Psychohistorian ‘assimilates every event into a single deterministic schema, thus denies the past the will of its own’. People have no individuality, therefore, do not act out of a variety of motives; and events have no complexity, therefore, can not have a multiplicity of causes and effects. Past is to be understood in the light of the theory of psychohistorian who is convinced of the ‘absolute rightness of his own theory’ and so we have to be as well that his explanation is ‘the deepest and every other explanation falls short of the truth’.
   ‘The stimulus for action’ is the own definition of psychohistorian and this imparts psychohistory the great utility for rewriting past by violating the past itself.               

Words those work overtime work for political marketing

·       Words those are most useful work overtime. Unambiguity would be impossible if it were not for another important fact about them. Usefulness can be tapped by controlling the ‘verbal setting that rules out maverick senses quite decisively’. Political marketing consultant takes help from the words of many senses to help politician confronted with the problem to address an issue to please every not at the expense of anyone especially when the division of opinion exists regarding that issue. Political marketing consultant hunts for the words so to create context that makes virtually impossible for the audience to decide quite definitely which of the many senses of the word is relevant: everyone has the satisfaction of believing that he only has read accurately the meaning of word.

Necessary and sufficient condition

(In logic, one statement is a necessary and sufficient condition of another means that the former statement is true if and only if the latter is true; in politics political marketing consultant applies it as the propaganda tool; and necessary condition becomes false (though it is right) because it is not a sufficient condition; and a sufficient condition makes a necessary condition true (though it may not be).

·       God loves humans as every preacher makes us believe so but does not explain that why God allows people he loves to go hungry to bed. (Hunger may be the part of a divine scheme or the outcome of indolence; but it is implied that a necessary condition has to be a sufficient condition to be true.)

·       Leader of yours is jetting the globe to muster international support; soon you will have the backing of international community. (A sufficient condition is not a necessary condition as implied.)

Speaking for not saying anything

·        Once in a conference, a man speaker in his own right, surprised me by saying ‘If one has nothing to say, better he should not say anything’ and stood down the podium. I questioned myself ‘what happened’? I knew that he was a very confident speaker and can not have butterflies in stomach; ‘Nature’ this could only be possible explanation for me ‘must have been calling him’. In retrospect, I can grip the profoundness of remarks. Many of our writer write for not writing anything; and many of our speakers speak for not saying anything. One can only say, if he has nothing to say by resorting to artifice or entangling himself in circumlocutions.    

Fallacy

·       Patients were given three different painkillers: A, B, C. Painkillers were not given simultaneously; doctors found the effect of medicine A more lasting, therefore, A is the best painkiller.