Dr Sohail Ansari

Unarmed Prophets; Complex fallacies   By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. ·       If for a writer contradictions in chronology among his books are more important than their overall unity; so each of his book can be independently satisfying but they may have no cumulative effect. Unarmed Prophets ·         When one of many permitted perceptions on and of life is declared as the only perception the ideology petrifies. Thinking is thinking if it is on the lines thought to be the only lines and the vision is to see the world in the light thought to be the only permitted light. Philosophers are caught on the horns of a dilemma either they cease to be intellectuals or they end by being disarmed. Many be...

Low –ethos talk to erode interest in Idealogy; Affordance. By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. ·       If monitoring voters’ brains guides to voting tendencies and listening to what they say misguides then all voters are liars. Low-ethos Talk on Islam: the way to undermine ideology Islam cannot be challenged head-on in a country like Pakistan; even coded criticism can have the serious implications. Private channels are not even subtle in their condemnation; they simply violate the classical interpretation of ethos. Channels have apparently no vested interest or ulterior motive in the talk shows and debates on the Islam as the ideology; however, almost all speakers or participants have no phronesis (practical skill) and arête (goodness or...

Denial for unfalsifiable interpretation; Points to ponder; Google smear By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. ·       Denial of abuser gains credibility with the denial of victim and loses it when victim challenges the denial of abusers by recanting his own denial. The use of denial to create unfalsifiable interpretation For Anna freud ‘Denial conflicts with the ability to learn from and cope with reality’; however political marketing consultant capitalizes on research that has significantly expanded the scope and utility of the concept beyond a ‘mechanism of the immature minds’. Political marketing consultant uses the denial to create unfalsifiable interpretation (that serves best to the concept that leader or guru can never be wrong): My...

The Real Irony Of Our Age & Writer And Actresses Of EAST  By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. The real irony of our age The wider gap between how the world is and how powerful interests try to portray, the more infected our age is of the virus of fakery. Distortions are much more easily contrived, due to the cutting edge of innovation. Public relation industry is at the forefront of airbrushing, manipulating photographs creating fake demonstrations, fake pressure groups with all the paraphernalia of fake leaflets, tee shirts, websites. In the age of fake, the distinctions between fake and real is less easy to discern; but the real irony is that fake sometime is so sophisticated that real is rejected as fake. Writer and Actresses of EAST  ...

Impress more but persuade less, Creating twist, Points to ponder, fallacies    By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. ·       Only human can understand other human; my husband does not understand me; therefore, he is not a human. Impress more but persuade less   Writing aims at self-projection establishes the intellectual cachet of a writer: it impresses more but persuades less; reader feels that through it comes the wisdom of the ages though much part of it is beyond his comprehension. Good writing moves reader many levels beyond his own thinking and opens him to the world in a different and better way.     Creating twist   The meaning of communication acts depends on what they are about ; the use of...

Manipulating or faking ethos, Points to ponder   By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. ·       Implied talk is the talk about things that do not appear on the surface of conversation; or it is not about things that appear on the surface of conversation. ·       Objectivity of the anchorperson lies in feigning no direct interest in the outcome the debate. Manipulating or faking ethos  Words are partially limited by words. Ethos is not limited by what the speaker says because ‘ethos does not belong to the speaker but to the audience’ and it always extends to the history of the speaker ‘moral competence’; therefore, political marketing consultant having realized that speaker cannot establish ethos from th...

Stupid answer does not.. When the dismissal must be dismissed   By  Dr. Sohail Ansari Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words). He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism. ·       One of our major flaws is to see one as saint because of one quality despite many flaws and as devil because of one flaw despite many qualities. Stupid answer does not always prove you stupid.  Wrong questions are of various kinds: ask a child about the feelings he will be introduced much later in life and you will get the stupid answer; but the stupidity of answer proves the stupidity of questioner not of a child . Question is wrong for the person if it proves him wrong. Question the licentious hedonist of the rightness of asceticism. Answer: ‘This is the right way of living a life’ proves the stupidity of a respondent as ...