Thing proves regardless of itself, Fallacy, points to ponder
Thing proves regardless
of itself, Fallacy, points to ponder,
By Dr.
Sohail Ansari
Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of
concepts and originality of words).
He believes that there can never be a zero scope for
improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism.
·
Every popular
drama drives its popularity from the rare performance of any of its actor.
·
Moral
authority of a leader can only defuse a crisis of faith.
·
To understand
what a theory is for, one must understand what a theory is.
Things prove
regardless of itself.
·
Thing proves itself right or wrong because of the wrong
method of assessment. Theory is not defined as it must be by its system of concepts,
models, principles, which in concert make the empirical world more intelligible
but by paradigms (overall arching beliefs) a group of people use to understand
theories. Interestingly right theory becomes wrong and wrong appears right
then.
Fallacy
and logical absurdity
·
Theoretical creativity is not possible without intellectual
creativity; therefore intellectual creativity is impossible without theoretical
creativity.
·
Poet does not know all meanings of word when he applies
words; therefore, poet does know meanings of all words when he applies word.
·
Democracy is the convenient tool to manipulate it.
Points
to ponder
·
Democracy gives the right to choose but never allow this
right to translate into the decision to say ‘No, thanks’ to democracy.
·
Philosopher has to be a writer so when one part of his
provides philosophy; other provides an extraordinary language so that readers
can learn the philosophical usages of ordinary language.
·
It needs a great deal of fancy theoretical footwork to
prove what socialists say that fulfillment of the interest of working class is
not an end in itself but means to well-integrated culture. (One must believe
then that interests of classes are not mutually exclusive).
·
Empirical evidence that underlies the main tenets of the
theory gives it the specific orientation; and its inherent open-endedness
accounts for its vaguely formulated part.
·
Ethnic feud has
hair-trigger sensitivities because each member of warring side nurses a sense of
victimization.
·
Paradigms, as it is believed, prove to be constitutive of
all scientific activity; therefore, determine what to attend to and what to
ignore. True, if fundamental assumptions (about the nature of the universe) those
are constitutive of paradigms are true.
·
Engels is quoted as saying ‘no party can condemn me to
silence if I have decided to speak’. Truly courageous words indeed; however
sometimes it needs more courage to be silent when not offering eulogy is
tantamount to offence.
·
Inequality between haves and have-nots creates conflict,
and conflict then is believed to solve all problems of inequality.
Comments
Post a Comment