Industrialization and POLITICAL COMMUNICATION
By Prof Dr. Sohail Ansari
Conceived and worded by Prof DR Sohail Ansari (originality of
concepts and originality of words).
He believes that there can never be a zero
scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of
criticism.
Pervasiveness of
political communication underlines the continuing need to understand reasons
that not only brought political communication at the first place but also kept
it at the very heart of the process of dynamic change in our political culture.
Industrialization
marked a watershed in human’s history. Job beckoned multitude of people; and as
people gravitated to where the industries were, cities sprang up. In
industrialized societies, people had imperfect information about the problems
and people who could solve them. In contrast, a small scale community had no
need for media advertising; because the sources of solutions (tribal chiefs)
were nearby and word-of-mouth communication was adequate to enlighten and
galvanize people: familiar problems were solved by familiar people.
The coming of a market
industrial society introduced a radical change. For the first time, the
majority of the population was surrounded by problems occurred in settings that
were no longer familiar, although initially most problems resembled those at
home.
But gradually the
consumer society became flooded with problems that could not be solved by the
inhabitants’ unaided senses and intellect alone. As unfamiliar problems
appeared, political communication stepped in to establish link between problems
and their solvers; for people either had no information regarding issues like
global warming or no idea how to resolve unemployment and corruption issues.
Through political advertising; political marketing; and political debates;
candidate marketed themselves and competed to prove better.
In industrial
societies, therefore, all components of political communication have become
almost the only vehicles of communication between leaders and voters. Regarded
superficially, political communication promotes, justifies and condemns parties
and leaders. Looked in depth, the ways in which messages are presented in
political ads; political rhetoric; political debate; political news and in
political language reach deeply into our most serious concerns: interpersonal
and family relations, the sense of happiness and content; the fading away or
dilution of cultural traditions; the economy of country; personal or provincial
autonomy; and many others.
Comments
Post a Comment