Hazart Ali (RA) as I do not know

By Prof Dr. Sohail Ansari
Conceived and worded by DR Sohail Ansari (originality of concepts and originality of words).
He believes that there can never be a zero scope for improvement and appreciates criticism if it is not for the sake of criticism.

Want to believe in Hazart Ali (RA) as you know
Answer me only a few questions.  
(I was honored to watch a video …….extolling the virtues of  Hazrat ALI Karam allah wajho. I respect Hazart Ali as much as I respect the Islamic worldview of justice: ‘justice denotes placing things in their rightful place’ hence, Justice is to give thing importance as it deserves and Injustice is underestimation or overestimation. I do not intend to imply that Allama is wrong, this is my  deficiency of knowledge that does not permit me to believe all what he says; however if someone answers me a few questions I will be at home with the content of Allama’s speech).  
Honorable Allama said: ‘A scientist was extended in measuring the distance between different galaxies. A friend of his gave him the book  Nahj al-Balagha (“The Nahj al-Balagha (Arabic: Ù†Ù‡Ø¬ البلاغة‎‎)  (‘The Peak of Eloquence") is the most famous collection of sermons, letters, tafsirs and narrations attributed to Hazart Ali, It was collected by Sharif Razi, a Shia scholar in the tenth century. Known for its eloquent content, it is considered a masterpiece of literature in Shi'i Islam, third only to the Quran and Prophetic narrations’’). Scientist having read it wrote 1000 letters to his friends (1000 scientists) and said to them: ‘author of this book (Hazart Ali) either created galaxies himself or he was the witness when the galaxies were being created (Hazart Ali was shown the formation of galaxies)’.  
·         A group of scientists invested itself in documenting the intelligence of dolphin and concluded through various experiments that dolphin has a level of intelligence very near to human intelligence.  Other group believes that comparison may not be especially helpful and asserts: ‘Just as human intelligence is appropriate for the human needs, dolphin intelligence is right for the dolphin’s way of life; therefore, dolphin intelligence is different.   Human intelligence is adequate to the needs of human. If Allama wants to prove that Hazrat Ali was extraordinarily intelligent human, so this intelligence was not right for Ali’s way of life. Why he was given this intelligence?
·        God gives knowledge to His prophets to things beyond the grasp of human beings to establish their status as prophets or in other words to establish their superior status. Knowledge; however, is of things yet to happen (foreseeing or foreknowing) or is of things happened but known to very few (secret of past, or secret of nations or secret of individuals). Prophets have never given knowledge of things such as how galaxies came into being or what atom is composed of as knowledge of such things is irrelevant to the mission of theirs. Why Hazrat Ali was given that knowledge? And what utility that knowledge had for Hazrat Ali?
·        Things are beyond human if they do not lie within the domain of five senses. God, angels, hell are realities those are beyond physical perception as man cannot process them through five senses and therefore, are termed transcendental. There are two sources of knowledge: One through sense and second through divine means called Wahi (‘The Arabic word wahi comes from the root word waha and is used to describe divine revelation. In Islamic terminology, wahi can be precisely defined as God’s divine message conveyed to Allah’s chosen persons (Prophets). This message can be conveyed openly or in a hidden and concealed manner, imparting wisdom and knowledge that is beyond the material and physical realities of man’).  How Hazrat Ali got that knowledge of the formation of galaxies? (Knowledge that is too advanced even by modern standard). If Hazrat Ali had acquired this knowledge through five senses so he must have had extraordinarily sophisticated lab and equipment for observing, collecting and analyzing data. This is impossible as such lab (that helped Hazrat Ali to have so advanced knowledge) does not exist even today. Hazrat Ali must have had that knowledge then through divine means. This is impossible as well. Prophet was the only recipient of divine knowledge by virtue of his status as prophet. Hazrat Ali never had Wahi as he was not prophet; so he must have obtained this knowledge from prophet(P.B.U.H)  but prophet (P.B.U.H) needs not to have such knowledge because of its irrelevancy to his mission; furthermore prophet (P.B.U.H) never indicated to have knowledge of the formation of Galaxies. How Ali got such information? Is he God? Is he prophet? Is he a scientist who had Lab and equipment to collect information?
·         Respectable Allama must quote that particular passage or pages of a book Nahj al-Balagha that prompted a scientist to have that observation and to write thousands of letters.

Allama quoted a hadith: 'I am the house of wisdom and 'Ali is its door'."

·         Above mentioned Hadith is debatable.  TAHRIF in ‘Investigating Distortions in IslamicTexts’ has proved the presence of it in several detailed works (https://www.al-islam.org/tahrif/cityofknowledge/).

·         One should read Sunni perspective (http://www.chiite.fr/en/hadith_10.html) that ‘declared the Hadith to be Mawdoo (fabricated). Daraqutni labeled the Hadith as mudtarib (shaky), both in isnad and text. Tirmidhi labeled it is ghareeb (weak) and munkar (rejected). Bukhari said that the Hadith has no sahih narration and declared it un-acknowledgeable. Qurtubi said about this Hadith in al-Jame’ li Ahkam al-Quran: “This Hadith is Batil (false)!” Ibn Maeen said that the Hadith is a baseless lie. Dhahabi considered it a forgery and included it in his book on forged Hadiths. Al-Hakim declared that it is weak. Amongst others who dismissed the Hadith are Abu Zur`ah, Abu Hatim, Yahya bin Saeed, etc’.

(I believe for the sake of discussion that Hadith is accurate and reliable.)
Allama interpreted Hadith:door means that one has to go through it (door) to approach prophet (P.B.U.H) and then he has to leave through it. Entrance and exit are through door.
·         Allama suggests that one leaves through Hazrat Ali having gained knowledge from Prophet (P.B.U.H). Allama means that one meets prophet, gains knowledge and then meets Hazrat Ali. Hazrat Ali assesses the learning of a person.  This reasoning can be right if Allama proves two things: He must prove that Prophet taught first Hazrat Ali the things and later to other companions, because for assessment one must have knowledge of the things he assess.   Allama must prove that this was the practice (confirmation of knowledge by Hazrat Ali) among the companions of prophet (P.B.U.H).  
·        Allama suggests that one goes through Hazrat Ali to gain knowledge. Leaving through Hazrat Ali having gained knowledge (Exit through door) at least makes some sense but entrance through door (going through Hazrat Ali) means that a person going to Prophet (P.BU.H) meets Hazrat Ali first and then goes to Holy prophet.  For what he meets Hazart Ali? Does Hazrat Ali tell him what and how to ask from Prophet? Or Does Hazart Ali assess the problem, suggests solution and then prophet confirms Ali’s solution? If answer of these questions is yes then, one must prove that Prophet has taught everything before meeting question and problems of companions. But as we know that the Quran was not revealed at once, it was revealed in part and many times according to situation; and as soon as prophet discovered the solution through divine means he responded to questioner or to problem. If reasoning of Allma is right then he must prove that prophet kept questioner waiting or problem unsolved and first informed and taught Hazrat Ali things revealed and then responded to questions or problems.
·         Going through door (going through Hazrat Ali to meet prophet P.B.U.H) has two more possible meaning. Hazrat Ali gave people knowledge and people went to Prophet (P.B.U.H) to confirm it; Or Hazrat Ali gave form to things people had in mind to ask (shaping or refining questions). If this was the pattern of learning from Prophet (P.B.U.H) so Allama must prove from history through examples. If this were the pattern of learning then questions must have had uniformity in character.  Different people as we know dictated by their particular needs or problems went to Prophet; and the way of asking was as varied as people.
·         The word door is used figuratively and it means that sayings of Hazrat Ali or interpretations of Hazrat Ali to various things help one to understand sayings and interpretations of prophet (P.B.U.H). The word door is not used in literal sense; and if it is taken literally (as Allama has taken) then one has to prove that Hazrat Ali was with prophet (P.B.U.H) as the door keeper/ gatekeeper and everybody had to go through former to meet latter and then leaves through former after meeting latter.  
Tenets authoritatively laid down or assumptions define as dogma of infallibility (incontrovertibly true) can only attract individuals those consider emotions important rather than reasons as they listen or read things they believe cannot be wrong. Dogma requires strength of logic not emotionality for its spread, penetration and permeation.

Comments