Research Assignment #23: Design experimental design & and explore the different purposes or roles of Variables For the Departments of English & Media Studies by Prof Dr Sohail Ansari
Experimental
design
Instructor: Devin Kowalczyk
Devin has taught psychology and has a master's degree in
clinical forensic psychology. He is working on his PhD.
This lesson
explores the terminology of experimental design. What are variables? How do
they influence each other? Is it possible that you are seeing connections that
don't actually exist?
Research
As a researcher, you're going to perform an experiment. I'm kind
of hungry right now, so let's say your experiment will examine four people's
ability to throw a ball when they haven't eaten for a specific period of time -
6, 12, 18 and 24 hours.
Task: As a researcher, you're going to perform an experiment. People
you assume on the basis of an essay of research assignment 20 are not happy
with the king or his way of governance, so let's say your experiment will
examine ….. People’s …… to ……..
(Complete a sentence)
We can say that in your experiment, you are going to do
something and then see what happens to other things. But, that sentence isn't
very scientific. So, we're going to learn some new words to replace the
unscientific ones, so we can provide a scientific explanation for what you're
going to do in your experiment.
The starting point here is to identify what a variable is.
A variable is defined as anything that has a quantity or
quality that varies. Your experiment's variables are not eating and throwing a
ball.
Task: You examine people from different walks of life
You examine people belonging to different
age groups
You examine people having
different litracy levels.
Your
variable is defined as……
Let's say your experiment will examine people's ability to judge
a king.
Questions:
Do you think this experiment will serve our purpose?
Do you thinl for this experiment we need people from different
walks of life? Different age groups? Different litrarcy levels?
If you think this experiment will not serve our purpose so
devise other experiemtent.
Do not you think we need to examine people from different professions,
age groups and having different litracy levels as all these have the impact on
the way people perceive?
‘Now, let's science up that earlier statement. 'You are going to
manipulate a variable to see what happens to another variable.' It still isn't
quite right because we're using the blandest term for variable, and we didn't
differentiate between the variables. Let's take a look at some other terms that
will help us make this statement more scientific and specific.
Dependent and Independent Variables
A moment ago, we discussed the two variables in our experiment -
hunger and throwing a ball. But, they are both better defined by the terms
'dependent' or 'independent' variable.
The dependent variable is the variable a
researcher is interested in. The changes to the dependent variable are what the
researcher is trying to measure with all their fancy techniques. In our
example, your dependent variable is the person's ability to throw a ball. We're
trying to measure the change in ball throwing as influenced by hunger.
An independent variable is a variable believed
to affect the dependent variable. This is the variable that you, the
researcher, will manipulate to see if it makes the dependent variable change.
In our example of hungry people throwing a ball, our independent variable is
how long it's been since they've eaten.
Questions:
If in our example, our dependent variable is the person's
ability to judge a king. We're trying to measure the change in judging as
influenced by …….. Complete a sentence
If in our example, our dependent variable is the person's
perception of a king. We're trying to measure the change in perception as
influenced by …….. Complete a sentence
Del Siegle, Ph.D.
Neag School of Education – University of Connecticut
del.siegle@uconn.edu
www.delsiegle.com
Neag School of Education – University of Connecticut
del.siegle@uconn.edu
www.delsiegle.com
Each person/thing we collect data on is called an OBSERVATION (in
our work these are usually people/subjects. Currently, the term participant
rather than subject is used when describing the people from whom we collect
data).
OBSERVATIONS (participants) possess a variety of CHARACTERISTICS.
If a CHARACTERISTIC of an OBSERVATION (participant) is the same
for every member of the group (doesn’t vary) it is called a CONSTANT.
Questions:
You examine people having different litracy levels. But do not
you think that a characteristic of participants is the same for every member of
the group of matric students?
If a CHARACTERISTIC of an OBSERVATION (participant) differs for
group members it is called a VARIABLE.
In research we don’t get excited about CONSTANTS (since everyone is the same on
that characteristic); we’re more interested in VARIABLES. Variables can be
classified as QUANTITATIVE or QUALITATIVE (also known as CATEGORICAL).
QUANTITATIVE variables are ones that exist along a continuum
that runs from low to high. Ordinal,
interval, and ratio variables are quantitative. QUANTITATIVE variables
are sometimes called CONTINUOUS VARIABLES because they have a variety
(continuum) of characteristics. Height in inches and scores on a test would be
examples of quantitative variables.
Questions:
Tell what ‘scores on a test’ mean? And for our puporse what a test
and score mean?
QUALITATIVE variables do not express differences in amount, only
differences. They are sometimes referred to as CATEGORICAL variables because
they classify by categories. Nominal variables
such as gender, religion, or eye color are CATEGORICAL variables. Generally
speaking, categorical variables
Questions:
You examine people from different walks of life.
You examine people belonging to different age groups.
You examine people having different litracy levels.
Do you think you need categorical variables?
Categorical variables are groups…such as
gender or type of degree sought. Quantitative variables are numbers that have
a range…like weight in pounds or baskets made during a ball game. When we
analyze data we do turn the categorical variables into numbers but only for
identification purposes…e.g. 1 = male and 2 = female. Just because 2 = female
does not mean that females are better than males who are only 1.
Question:
As we read that when we analyze data we do
turn the categorical variables into numbers but only for identification
purposes it does not mean one is better than other. You examine people having different litracy levels; and find for example;
100 matric students and 10 Phd students. Can we say one is not better than
other?
Question:
With quantitative data having a higher number
means you have more of something. So higher values have meaning.
You examine people having different litracy levels; and find for example; 100
matric students and 10 Phd students. Can we say having higher number mean
higher values?
|
A special case of a CATEGORICAL variable is a DICHOTOMOUS
VARIABLE. DICHOTOMOUS variables have only two CHARACTERISTICS (male or female).
When naming QUALITATIVE variables, it is important to name the category rather
than the levels (i.e., gender is the variable name, not male and female).
Variables have different purposes or roles…
Independent (Experimental, Manipulated, Treatment, Grouping)
Variable-That factor which is measured, manipulated, or selected by the
experimenter to determine its relationship to an observed phenomenon. “In
a research study, independent variables are antecedent conditions that are
presumed to affect a dependent variable. They are either manipulated by the
researcher or are observed by the researcher so that their values can be
related to that of the dependent variable. For example, in a research study on
the relationship between mosquitoes and mosquito bites, the number of
mosquitoes per acre of ground would be an independent variable” (Jaeger, 1990,
p. 373)
Question: If we say relationship between types of mosquitoes and
mosquito bites. So what does it mean? And then we must write ……of mosquitoes…..
Question: If we say relationship between time and mosquito bites. So
what does it mean? And then we must write ……of mosquitoes…..
Question: If we say relationship between hunger and mosquito bites.
So what does it mean? And then we must write ……of mosquitoes…..
While the independent variable is often manipulated by the
researcher, it can also be a classification where subjects are assigned to
groups. In a study where one variable causes the other, the independent
variable is the cause. In a study where groups are being compared, the
independent variable is the group classification.
Question: Your independent variable is the classification of people
according to age, literacy and profession but if one variable casuses the
other, the independent variable is the cause. Can you say your independent variable
is group classification?
Dependent (Outcome) Variable-That
factor which is observed and measured to determine the effect of the
independent variable, i.e., that factor that appears, disappears, or varies as
the experimenter introduces, removes, or varies the independent variable. “In a
research study, the independent variable defines a principal focus of research
interest. It is the consequent variable that is presumably affected by one or
more independent variables that are either manipulated by the researcher or
observed by the researcher and regarded as antecedent conditions that determine
the value of the dependent variable. For example, in a study of the
relationship between mosquitoes and mosquito bites, the number of mosquito
bites per hour would be the dependent variable” (Jaeger, 1990, p. 370). The
dependent variable is the participant’s response.
Can we say: ‘the penetration of bite per hour would be the dependent
variable and pain people feel is the dependent variable’?
The dependent variable is the outcome. In an experiment, it may
be what was caused or what changed as a result of the study. In a comparison of
groups, it is what they differ on.
Moderator Variable- That factor which is measured,
manipulated, or selected by the experimenter to discover whether it modifies
the relationship of the independent variable to an observed phenomenon. It is a
special type of independent variable.
The independent variable’s relationship with the dependent
variable may change under different conditions. That condition is the moderator
variable. In a study of two methods of teaching reading, one of the methods of
teaching reading may work better with boys than girls. Method of teaching
reading is the independent variable and reading achievement is the dependent
variable. Gender is the moderator variable because it moderates or changes the
relationship between the independent variable (teaching method) and the
dependent variable (reading achievement).
Task: you have to prove that both methods of teaching are wrong or
in other words neither is effective, so what you have to do?
Suppose we do a study of reading achievement where we compare
whole language with phonics, and we also include students’ social economic
status (SES) as a variable. The students are randomly assigned to either whole
language instruction or phonics instruction. There are students of high and low
SES in each group.
Let’s assume that we found that whole language instruction
worked better than phonics instruction with the high SES students, but phonics
instruction worked better than whole language instruction with the low SES
students. Later you will learn in statistics that this is an interaction
effect. In this study, language instruction was the independent variable (with
two levels: phonics and whole language). SES was the moderator variable (with
two levels: high and low). Reading achievement was the dependent variable
(measured on a continuous scale so there aren’t levels).
With a moderator variable, we find the type of instruction did
make a difference, but it worked differently for the two groups on the
moderator variable. We select this moderator variable because we think it is a
variable that will moderate the effect of the independent on the dependent. We
make this decision before we start the study.
If the moderator had not been in the study above, we would have
said that there was no difference in reading achievement between the two types
of reading instruction. This would have happened because the average of the
high and low scores of each SES group within a reading instruction group would
cancel each other an produce what appears to be average reading achievement in
each instruction group (i.e., Phonics: Low—6 and High—2; Whole Language:
Low—2 and High—6; Phonics has an average of 4 and Whole Language has an average
of 4. If we just look at the averages (without regard to the moderator), it
appears that the instruction types produced similar results).
Suppose we do a study of achievements of reform (reforms launched by
a king) where we compare whole reforms, and let’s assume that we found that
whole reforms worked better than reforms in agriculture sector. In this study,
reforms were the independent variable and economic acheivemnt was the dependent
variable. Reforms appered to work better as the whole than reforms in one
sector alone.
Question: tell the factor which is measured, manipulated, or selected by the
experimenter to discover whether it modifies the relationship of the
independent variable to an observed phenomenon?
With a moderator variable, we find
that the reforms did make a difference, but it worked differently for the two
groups on the moderator variable. For example big landlords associated with a
king got all benefits but small landlords suffered.
If the moderator is not used in this study, we would have said that
there was no difference in the achievements of reforms.
Tell which moderator is to be used?
Extraneous Variable- Those factors which cannot be
controlled.
Extraneous variables are independent variables that have not been controlled. They may or may not influence the results. One way to control an extraneous variable which might influence the results is to make it a constant (keep everyone in the study alike on that characteristic). If SES were thought to influence achievement, then restricting the study to one SES level would eliminate SES as an extraneous variable.
Extraneous variables are independent variables that have not been controlled. They may or may not influence the results. One way to control an extraneous variable which might influence the results is to make it a constant (keep everyone in the study alike on that characteristic). If SES were thought to influence achievement, then restricting the study to one SES level would eliminate SES as an extraneous variable.
Do you think restricting the effects of reform to big land lords
would eliminate an extraneous variable?
Here are some examples similar to your homework:
Null Hypothesis: Students who receive pizza coupons as a reward
do not read more books than students who do not receive pizza coupon rewards.
Independent Variable: Reward Status
Dependent Variable: Number of Books Read
Independent Variable: Reward Status
Dependent Variable: Number of Books Read
High achieving students do not perform better than low achieving
student when writing stories regardless of whether they use paper and pencil or
a word processor.
Independent Variable: Instrument Used for Writing
Moderator Variable: Ability Level of the Students
Dependent Variable: Quality of Stories Written
When we are comparing two groups, the groups are the independent variable. When we are testing whether something influences something else, the influence (cause) is the independent variable. The independent variable is also the one we manipulate. For example, consider the hypothesis “Teachers given higher pay will have more positive attitudes toward children than teachers given lower pay.”
One approach is to ask ourselves “Are there two or more groups being compared?” The answer is “Yes.” “What are the groups?” Teachers who are given higher pay and teachers who are given lower pay. Therefore, the independent variable is teacher pay (it has two levels– high pay and low pay). The dependent variable (what the groups differ on) is attitude towards school.
Independent Variable: Instrument Used for Writing
Moderator Variable: Ability Level of the Students
Dependent Variable: Quality of Stories Written
When we are comparing two groups, the groups are the independent variable. When we are testing whether something influences something else, the influence (cause) is the independent variable. The independent variable is also the one we manipulate. For example, consider the hypothesis “Teachers given higher pay will have more positive attitudes toward children than teachers given lower pay.”
One approach is to ask ourselves “Are there two or more groups being compared?” The answer is “Yes.” “What are the groups?” Teachers who are given higher pay and teachers who are given lower pay. Therefore, the independent variable is teacher pay (it has two levels– high pay and low pay). The dependent variable (what the groups differ on) is attitude towards school.
We could also approach this another way. “Is something causing
something else?” The answer is “Yes.”
“What is causing what?” Teacher pay is causing attitude towards school. Therefore, teacher pay
is the independent variable (cause) and attitude towards school is the dependent variable (outcome).
“What is causing what?” Teacher pay is causing attitude towards school. Therefore, teacher pay
is the independent variable (cause) and attitude towards school is the dependent variable (outcome).
The research question drives the study. It should specifically
state what is being investigated. Statisticians often convert their research
questions to null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis states that
no relationship (correlation study) or difference (experimental study) exists.
Converting research questions to hypotheses is a simple task. Take the
questions and make it a positive statement that says a relationship exists
(correlation studies) or a difference exists (experiment study) between the
groups and we have the alternative hypothesis. Write a statement that a
relationship does not exist or a difference does not exist and we have the null
hypothesis.
We find that the reforms did make a difference, but it worked
differently for the two groups.
Write the null or the alternative hypothesis.
Format for sample research questions and accompanying
hypotheses:
Research Question for Relationships: Is
there a relationship between height and weight?
Null Hypothesis: There is no relationship between height and weight.
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a relationship between height and weight.
Null Hypothesis: There is no relationship between height and weight.
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a relationship between height and weight.
When a researcher states a nondirectional hypothesis in a study
that compares the performance of two groups, she doesn’t state which group she
believes will perform better. If the word “more” or “less” appears in the
hypothesis, there is a good chance that we are reading a directional
hypothesis. A directional hypothesis is one where the researcher states which
group she believes will perform better. Most researchers use nondirectional
hypotheses.
We find that the reforms did make a difference, but it worked
differently for the two groups. Write a directional hypothesis
We usually write the alternative hypothesis (what we believe
might happen) before we write the null hypothesis (saying it won’t happen).
Directional
Research Question for Differences: Do boys like reading more than girls?
Null Hypothesis: Boys do not like reading more than girls.
Alternative Hypothesis: Boys do like reading more than girls.
Research Question for Differences: Do boys like reading more than girls?
Null Hypothesis: Boys do not like reading more than girls.
Alternative Hypothesis: Boys do like reading more than girls.
Nondirectional
Research Question for Differences: Is there a difference between boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading? –or– Do boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading differ?
Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading. –or– Boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading do not differ.
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a difference between and girls’ attitude towards reading. –or– Boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading differ.boys’
Research Question for Differences: Is there a difference between boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading? –or– Do boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading differ?
Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading. –or– Boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading do not differ.
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a difference between and girls’ attitude towards reading. –or– Boys’ and girls’ attitude towards reading differ.boys’
Comments
Post a Comment