Macron stood at the UN and claimed Hamas has “never operated” in Judea and Samaria.

That is false. Hamas has maintained a presence there for decades and has claimed responsibility for attacks against Israelis originating there.

That's as true as saying Macron popularity in France is high (spoiler: it is not)

The claim that Hamas has never operated in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) is factually incorrect.

Here is a breakdown of the facts, logic, and context regarding that statement and the reality on the ground:

The Factual Reality

Historical Presence: Hamas has maintained an active organizational, political, and militant presence in the West Bank since the late 1980s.
Militant Operations: West Bank cells affiliated with Hamas have planned and executed numerous attacks against Israeli civilians and soldiers over the decades, including suicide bombings during the Second Intifada and more recent shooting attacks.
Security Arrests: The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) security forces routinely conduct operations to arrest Hamas operatives and dismantle active underground cells in West Bank cities like Nablus, Jenin, and Hebron.

Logical & Evaluative Judgment

Fact vs. Rhetoric: If Emmanuel Macron or any diplomat stated that Hamas has "never operated" in the area, that statement contradicts documented security data, intelligence reports, and Hamas's own historical claims of responsibility for West Bank attacks.
Distinction Between Gaza and the West Bank: While Hamas's primary military and de facto governing stronghold has been the Gaza Strip since 2007, treating the West Bank as entirely free of Hamas infrastructure ignores the interconnected nature of Palestinian political and militant factions.
Political Context: Statements made at international forums like the UN often carry diplomatic objectives—such as distinguishing between different territories, governance actors (like the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority in the West Bank versus Hamas in Gaza), or pushing for specific two-state frameworks. However, glossing over or erasing an active militant presence does not align with the on-the-ground security reality.