Propaganda and defamation in the guise of entertainment and research.



‘The Satanic Verses’The Truth About Muhammad

For the department of English and Media studies. By Prof DR Sohail AnsariDead line: 11thMayObjectives: Making students the critical consumer of information. Initiating students into the art of academic writing.

The Satanic Verses
NOVEL BY RUSHDIE
‘The Satanic Versesmagic realist epic novel by British Indian writer Salman Rushdie that upon its publication in 1988 became one of the most controversial books in recent times. Its fanciful and satiric use of Islam struck Muslims as blasphemous, and Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa against the author in 1989, enjoining Muslims to kill not only Rushdie but also his editors and publishers. Violent demonstrations followed in Pakistan; copies of the novel were burned in Britain, where several bookstores were bombed; and the work was banned in several countries.

The Satanic Verses is a novel not a research article or academic book. But if it could be ignored just as a novel, there would not have been a fatwa and demonstrations.

‘The Satanic Verses controversy, also known as the Rushdie Affair, was the heated and frequently violent reaction of Muslims to the publication of Salman Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses, which was first published in the United Kingdom in 1988 and inspired in part by the life of Muhammad’(P.B.U.H).

‘The issue was said to have divided "Muslims from Westerners along the fault line of culture," and to have pitted a core Western value of freedom of expression—that no one "should be killed, or face a serious threat of being killed, for what they say or write"—against the view of many Muslims—that no one should be free to "insult and malign Muslims" by disparaging the "honour of the Prophet’.


If Rushdie were just a novelist, he would not have been awarded a knighthood.
‘Rushdie was awarded a knighthood for services to literature in the Queen's Birthday Honours on 16 June 2007. He remarked, "I am thrilled and humbled to receive this great honour, and am very grateful that my work has been recognised in this way."
If Rushdie were just a novelist, the act of awarding would not have sparked an angry reaction from the Muslim world:

"Awarding a person who is one of the most hated figures in the Islamic world is a clear sign of the anti-Islamic stance of high-ranking British officials. …It proves desecration of Islamic values in the West is totally organised and done with the support and under the direction of those countries." All countries have a red line in their policies. For instance, in spite of freedom of speech a university professor and a political figure loses his job because of denying the Holocaust in Europe. Salman Rushdie has been a controversial figure who is known less for his literary contribution and more for his offensive and insulting writing which deeply hurts the sentiments of Muslims all over the world. Conferment of a knighthood on Salman Rushdie shows an utter lack of sensitivity on the part of the British government’.
If Rushdie were just a novelist, he would not have been lionized, feted and hero-worshipped so lavishly.
Praise for The Satanic Verses
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • “[A] torrent of endlessly inventive prose, by turns comic and enraged, embracing life in all its contradictions. In this spectacular novel, verbal pyrotechnics barely outshine its psychological truths.”—Newsday
Praise for The Satanic Verses

One of the most controversial and acclaimed novels ever written, The Satanic Verses is Salman Rushdie’s best-known and most galvanizing book. Set in a modern world filled with both mayhem and miracles, the story begins with a bang: the terrorist bombing of a London-bound jet in midflight. Two Indian actors of opposing sensibilities fall to earth, transformed into living symbols of what is angelic and evil. This is just the initial act in a magnificent odyssey that seamlessly merges the actual with the imagined. A book whose importance is eclipsed only by its quality, The Satanic Verses is a key work of our times.

Praise for The Satanic Verses

“Rushdie is a storyteller of prodigious powers, able to conjure up whole geographies, causalities, climates, creatures, customs, out of thin air.”—The New York Times Book Review

Praise for The Satanic Verses


“Exhilarating, populous, loquacious, sometimes hilarious, extraordinary . . . a roller-coaster ride over a vast landscape of the imagination.”—The Guardian (London)

Praise for The Satanic Verses


“A novel of metamorphoses, hauntings, memories, hallucinations, revelations, advertising jingles, and jokes. Rushdie has the power of description, and we succumb.”—The Times (London)
‘Indian-born British writer whose allegorical novels examine historical and philosophical issues by means of surreal characters, brooding humour, and an effusive and melodramatic prose style.’

Britannica

 

Referencing is a way to validate research

 

 Research contains citations to validate itself. Citations indicate that it draws on the ideas, words or research of other researchers or scholars.

Referencing is a way to provide evidence to support the assertions and claims in one’s own research. By citing experts, a researcher shows readers that he is aware of the field in which he is operating. Citations map the space of researcher’s discipline and allow him to navigate his way through his chosen field of study, in the same way that sailors steer by the stars.
References should always be accurate, allowing readers to trace the sources of information a researcher has used. Citations make writing more persuasive’. 

 

Deception through Referencing


Research involves using other people's ideas and work to develop work, but if other people's ideas and work are disputed, and controversial, research relies upon something it must not rely upon, thus becomes dubious itself despite its acknowledgment of the sources and the use of ‘accurate references’ those are inaccurate in themselves. People read work and find the source of the information never knowing that source is itself wrong.
Satanic Verses 
 ‘The title Satanic Verses  refers to a legend of the Islamic Prophet Mohammad, when a few verses were supposedly spoken by him as part of the Qur'an, and then withdrawn on the grounds that the devil had sent them to deceive Mohammad into thinking they came from God. (by accounts from Tabari, )

‘Satanic Verses refers to words of "satanic suggestion" which the Islamic Prophet Muhammad is alleged to have mistaken for divine revelation. The alleged verses can be read in early biographies of Muhammad by al-Wāqidī, Ibn Sa'd and Ibn Ishaq, and the tafsir of al-Tabarī’.

Two main Sources of Rushdie:

Ibn Sa'd

al-Wāqidī


‘Many scholars including Muhammad al-Bukhari hardly ever used Ibn Ishaq narrations in their sahih books. According to al-Khaīb al-Baghdādī, all scholars of ahadith do not rely on any of his narrations. Others, like Ahmad ibn Hanbal, rejected his narrations on all matters related to fiqh.’
al-Wāqidī
 al-Shafi’i (d. 204 A.H.) said "All the books of al-Waqidi are lies. In Medina there were seven men who used to fabricate authorities, one of which was al-Waqidi." Ibn Abi Hatim, vol.4 pt.1 p.21

 Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 241 A.H.) said "He is a liar, makes alternations in the traditions"  Muhammad ibn Ahmad Al-Dhahabi,Mizan al-I`tidal fi Naqd al-Rijal, vol. 3 page 110

 Al-Nasa’i (d. 303 A.H.) said "The liars known for fabricating the hadith of the Messenger of Allah are four. They are: Arba’ah b. Abi Yahya in Medina, al-Waqidi in Baghdad, Muqatil b. Sulayman in Khurasan and Muhammad bin Sa’id in Syria." Yusuf ‘Abbas Hashmi, Zaynab bint Jahash, ‘Islamic Culture’ vol.XLI, No.1, Hyderabad (India), 1967]
Al-Bukhari (d. 256 A.H.) said "al-Waqidi has been abandoned in hadith. He fabricates hadith" Muhammad ibn Ahmad Al-Dhahabi,Mizan al-I`tidal fi Naqd al-Rijal, vol. 3 page 110
 Ishaq ibn Rahawayh (d. 238 A.H.) said "According to my view, he is one of those who fabricate Hadith"]  Ibn Hajr al-‘AsqalaniTahdhib al-Tahdhib, volume 9 page 366 No.604,
 Abu Dawood (d. 275 A.H.) said "I do not write his hadith and I do not report (hadith) on his authority. I have no doubt that he used to make up hadith" (Ibid)
16. Al-Albani (d. 1999 C.E.) said that al-Waqidi is a liar.(Ibid)

Dubious sources underpinning ‘Satanic verses’.

Satanic verses uses disputed and controversial ideas and work to validate itself, thus relies upon something it must not rely upon, and becomes dubious itself despite its acknowledgment of the sources and the use of ‘accurate references’ those are inaccurate in themselves.  

When one reads Spencer's book, The Truth About Muhammad, or The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades) one finds dubious sources underpinning the research of his, but the thing that makes the ‘scholarly work’ of Spencer worse is his ineptitude  and incompetence of examining the context in which something was said; therefore he misrepresents a text to support a position that it in fact does not support.

Renowned Evangelical Protestant scholar Dr. Donald A. Carson ascribed to his father, a Canadian minister, this phrase which has become widely-used:

"A text without a context is a pretext for a proof text."
Father of Dr. Donald A. Carson must have said this phrase for the ‘learned people’ like
Robert B. Spencer who has proved that the context for a Quran or a Scriptural passage is not simply its immediate location in the paragraph or pericope or chapter or book, but Robert B. Spencer.

Exercise:
Referencing can invalidate research but how can we find out?

Comments